Talk:Glorious Conquest: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
:It's possible that there is an upper limit for this bonus of 20%, if so, Tor could have a stronger bonus... but that's just speculation. --[[User:Shadowtop|Shadowtop]] 09:41, 25 August 2013 (EDT) | :It's possible that there is an upper limit for this bonus of 20%, if so, Tor could have a stronger bonus... but that's just speculation. --[[User:Shadowtop|Shadowtop]] 09:41, 25 August 2013 (EDT) | ||
i | i am of the opinion that the worship tables are as follows | ||
Wer 14% | |||
Tor 10% | |||
Kra 8% | |||
Bhy 6% | |||
Qxl 5% | |||
Grn | |||
Dur | |||
Rxa | |||
Tul | |||
Shz | |||
Ath 0% | |||
and the inherent racial mod gets added to this. - Qemoi | |||
Revision as of 17:12, 20 March 2014
Seem to have enough data to start drawing some conclusions:
dwf (+5%) > cen (+1%) > dgn, drw, elf, gno, liz, spr, trl (+0%)
tor, wer (+10%) > bhy (+6%) > qxl (+5%) > kra (+4%) > ath (+0%) > shz (-2%) > tul (-5%?) Assuming a base of 5%
--Shadowtop 16:32, 6 June 2013 (EDT)
More ath values would be great, hm, but hard to get these. Having Tor and Werredan both at +10% makes this spell actually not that Werredan-centric at all. -- WinterRose 03:36, 7 June 2013 (EDT)
- It's possible that there is an upper limit for this bonus of 20%, if so, Tor could have a stronger bonus... but that's just speculation. --Shadowtop 09:41, 25 August 2013 (EDT)
i am of the opinion that the worship tables are as follows Wer 14% Tor 10% Kra 8% Bhy 6% Qxl 5% Grn Dur Rxa Tul Shz Ath 0% and the inherent racial mod gets added to this. - Qemoi