Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Prestige Classes"
m |
|||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
</ul> | </ul> | ||
--[[User:Ylem|Ylem]] 16:00, 30 April 2007 (EDT) | --[[User:Ylem|Ylem]] 16:00, 30 April 2007 (EDT) | ||
+ | |||
+ | Thanks for the input. I think the giant info might be incorrect because of clipboard inheritance when I was creating the table. You are right, a link to the actual class would be better. I am not sure why I linked to the skills and spells. I agree that adding the prestige options to each class page and possibly also to each race page too would be better. I'll work on that. --[[User:Morgul|Morgul]] 10:23, 2 May 2007 (EDT) |
Latest revision as of 09:23, 2 May 2007
This was a first stab at a table to display race options for each prestige class. Of course, remort races can be nearly any prestige class. All of the information might not be correct, such as druid and mnd races. I am not completely sure whether hel and hor get an arc bonus, and I don't know all of the races that get a psi bonus. --Morgul 18:57, 23 April 2007 (EDT)
Few thoughts:
- I might be mis-reading this table but it looks like Giants can become Fusiliers (the intersection of the column/row is green). This might need to be looked at.
- Additionally the top row takes you to the spell/skill page for the class. Would it be more helpful to take it to the actual class?
- Lastly, this information might be more helpful to put a list of races that can be that class (or not) on each prestige class page rather than this large chart here. I would assume most people, when doing research for a class, will go directly to that class page and want all the relevant information there.
--Ylem 16:00, 30 April 2007 (EDT)
Thanks for the input. I think the giant info might be incorrect because of clipboard inheritance when I was creating the table. You are right, a link to the actual class would be better. I am not sure why I linked to the skills and spells. I agree that adding the prestige options to each class page and possibly also to each race page too would be better. I'll work on that. --Morgul 10:23, 2 May 2007 (EDT)