Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Wizards"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
: From what I've seen wizard and mage damage is identical. Wizards get more mana so they can surge longer, maybe that's what Waite meant. [[User:WinterRose|WinterRose]] 07:16, 25 January 2013 (EST) | : From what I've seen wizard and mage damage is identical. Wizards get more mana so they can surge longer, maybe that's what Waite meant. [[User:WinterRose|WinterRose]] 07:16, 25 January 2013 (EST) | ||
| − | The low end of my maelstrom damage range was ***DEMO as a lord mag gno bhy. When I switched to wizard, it become oblit. My HDL went up by one asterisk or so as well. | + | The low end of my maelstrom damage range was ***DEMO as a lord mag gno bhy. When I switched to wizard, it become oblit. My HDL went up by one asterisk or so as well. [[User:Waite|Waite]] 09:24, 25 January 2013 (EST) |
Revision as of 10:24, 25 January 2013
so the part about wizards "deal more spell damage" than mages - is that aside from getting more mana? the damage of disintegrate for example is more when cast by a wzd than a mag of same race/worship/etc? i always thought it was just referring to getting more mana, but i could be wrong.. --3nki 19:33, 24 January 2013 (EST)
- From what I've seen wizard and mage damage is identical. Wizards get more mana so they can surge longer, maybe that's what Waite meant. WinterRose 07:16, 25 January 2013 (EST)
The low end of my maelstrom damage range was ***DEMO as a lord mag gno bhy. When I switched to wizard, it become oblit. My HDL went up by one asterisk or so as well. Waite 09:24, 25 January 2013 (EST)
