Difference between revisions of "Talk:Executioner"

From AvatarWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 9: Line 9:
  
 
My guess is that 'voi did something sneaky, like setting the executioner's hp to something reasonable, before killing it.  It would probably take an imm a week to kill executioner the good old fashioned way, even though they do daunting every round.  [[User:Waite|Waite]] 10:30, 21 November 2006 (CST)
 
My guess is that 'voi did something sneaky, like setting the executioner's hp to something reasonable, before killing it.  It would probably take an imm a week to kill executioner the good old fashioned way, even though they do daunting every round.  [[User:Waite|Waite]] 10:30, 21 November 2006 (CST)
 +
 +
Yeah, the Executioner was hitting him for BUGGY!! damage.  I need a wield like that. --[[User:Morgul|Morgul]] 10:19, 22 November 2006 (CST)

Revision as of 11:19, 22 November 2006

so, can this guy be killed? --Arcano 20:59, 17 November 2006 (CST)

The executioner is killable in the sense that it has HP, and imms can slay it with commands. However, it has an exorbitant amount of HP, and is capable of regenerating it very, very quickly, thus making it invincible to regular attacks. I've watched Snikt fight the executioner in melee, and the result is a standstill due to Snikt's immortal invulnerability. -- Masamune, 23:04, 17 Nov 2006 (EST)

I saw Domovoi kill him once. I am assuming that the Executioner is lord level because Domovoi would not let us examine or ID the axe he carries. --Morgul 09:42, 21 November 2006 (CST)

Executioner is MUCH higher than lord level. As is his axe. --Kerdor 10:06, 21 November 2006 (CST)

My guess is that 'voi did something sneaky, like setting the executioner's hp to something reasonable, before killing it. It would probably take an imm a week to kill executioner the good old fashioned way, even though they do daunting every round. Waite 10:30, 21 November 2006 (CST)

Yeah, the Executioner was hitting him for BUGGY!! damage. I need a wield like that. --Morgul 10:19, 22 November 2006 (CST)