Difference between revisions of "Talk:Treasure-Hunting In Abyss"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
|||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
This is the only Treasure-Hunting in AreaName page that does anything more than refer to the [[Treasure-Hunting]] page. Aren't these best left as redirects? If we put the category in, they'll still be linked from the area category. --[[User:MooNFisH|Llanor]] 00:57, 7 February 2007 (CST) | This is the only Treasure-Hunting in AreaName page that does anything more than refer to the [[Treasure-Hunting]] page. Aren't these best left as redirects? If we put the category in, they'll still be linked from the area category. --[[User:MooNFisH|Llanor]] 00:57, 7 February 2007 (CST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Unfortunately, redirect pages ignore everything else on the page, including any attempt to categorize them. Either we put the [[Treasure-Hunting]] page in all of these categories and delete these little pages that link to it... or we keep things just as they are. Which would you prefer? :--[[User:DaveGarber1975|Dave Garber]] 01:23, 7 February 2007 (CST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::I'd prefer to keep it, if redirecting won't work. Perhaps the pages will find a future, like this one. A small future, but it could be one. | ||
| + | ::Maybe, if the area template is made and actually used, a direct link to treasure-hunting could be in there. Eventually. --[[User:MooNFisH|Llanor]] 05:00, 7 February 2007 (CST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :::Okeydoke. Whether we keep these pages as they are or put the Treasure-Hunting page within multiple categories, I don't see that either way is much better than the other and I don't have a strong preference myself. Like you, I'm not entirely satisfied with this structure as it is, but, so far, I can't think of a clearly-better way of arranging things. --[[User:DaveGarber1975|Dave Garber]] 16:17, 7 February 2007 (CST) | ||
Latest revision as of 18:17, 7 February 2007
This is the only Treasure-Hunting in AreaName page that does anything more than refer to the Treasure-Hunting page. Aren't these best left as redirects? If we put the category in, they'll still be linked from the area category. --Llanor 00:57, 7 February 2007 (CST)
- Unfortunately, redirect pages ignore everything else on the page, including any attempt to categorize them. Either we put the Treasure-Hunting page in all of these categories and delete these little pages that link to it... or we keep things just as they are. Which would you prefer? :--Dave Garber 01:23, 7 February 2007 (CST)
- I'd prefer to keep it, if redirecting won't work. Perhaps the pages will find a future, like this one. A small future, but it could be one.
- Maybe, if the area template is made and actually used, a direct link to treasure-hunting could be in there. Eventually. --Llanor 05:00, 7 February 2007 (CST)
- Okeydoke. Whether we keep these pages as they are or put the Treasure-Hunting page within multiple categories, I don't see that either way is much better than the other and I don't have a strong preference myself. Like you, I'm not entirely satisfied with this structure as it is, but, so far, I can't think of a clearly-better way of arranging things. --Dave Garber 16:17, 7 February 2007 (CST)
