Talk:Glorious Conquest

From AvatarWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Seem to have enough data to start drawing some conclusions:

dwf (+5%) > ogr (+3%) > cen (+1%) > dgn, drw, elf, gia, gno, ,hie, liz, spr, trl, tua(+0%)
tor, wer (+10%) > bhy (+6%) > qxl (+5%) > kra (+4%) > ath (+0%) > shz (-2%) > tul (-5%+?current minimum estimate) > grn (-7%) Assuming a base of 5% --Shadowtop 16:32, 6 June 2013 (EDT)

While the only data we have on TUL right only indicates a maximum penalty of -5%, this could be much greater given the nature of TUL as a deity of peace and the GRN penalty of -7%.--Shadowtop 02:15, 21 March 2014 (EDT)

More ath values would be great, hm, but hard to get these. Having Tor and Werredan both at +10% makes this spell actually not that Werredan-centric at all. -- WinterRose 03:36, 7 June 2013 (EDT)

It's possible that there is an upper limit for this bonus of 20%, if so, Tor could have a stronger bonus... but that's just speculation. --Shadowtop 09:41, 25 August 2013 (EDT)

i am of the opinion that the worship tables do something along these lines: Wer 14% Tor 10% Kra 8% Bhy 6% Qxl 5% Ath 0% Dur Rxa Grn -3% Tul Shz and the inherent racial mod gets added to this. - Qemoi

If the (dwf ath and ogr ath) values of 10% and 8% are compared, it can be seen that dwf tops ogr by 2%. Then if we see the (ogr wer) results of 18%, we can presume that a (dwf wer) would be 20% - which is equal to that of (dwf tor). Further, if you compare (dwf bhs), (dwf qxl) and (dwf kra) you can see that kra gives the smallest bonuses of the three. Finally, if (ogr ath) and (ogr grn) are compared, we can see 7% difference between them, which if (ath) is assumed to be 0%, makes (grn) a -7% penalty.--Shadowtop 02:11, 21 March 2014 (EDT)