Difference between revisions of "Talk:Glorious Conquest"

From AvatarWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
Line 8: Line 8:
 
:It's possible that there is an upper limit for this bonus of 20%, if so, Tor could have a stronger bonus... but that's just speculation. --[[User:Shadowtop|Shadowtop]] 09:41, 25 August 2013 (EDT)
 
:It's possible that there is an upper limit for this bonus of 20%, if so, Tor could have a stronger bonus... but that's just speculation. --[[User:Shadowtop|Shadowtop]] 09:41, 25 August 2013 (EDT)
  
i am of the opinion that the worship tables are as follows
+
i am of the opinion that the worship tables do something along these lines:
 
Wer 14%
 
Wer 14%
 
Tor 10%
 
Tor 10%
Line 14: Line 14:
 
Bhy 6%
 
Bhy 6%
 
Qxl 5%
 
Qxl 5%
Ath 4%
+
Ath 0%
 
Dur
 
Dur
 
Rxa
 
Rxa

Revision as of 13:27, 20 March 2014

Seem to have enough data to start drawing some conclusions:

dwf (+5%) > cen (+1%) > dgn, drw, elf, gno, liz, spr, trl (+0%)
tor, wer (+10%) > bhy (+6%) > qxl (+5%) > kra (+4%) > ath (+0%) > shz (-2%) > tul (-5%?) Assuming a base of 5% --Shadowtop 16:32, 6 June 2013 (EDT)

More ath values would be great, hm, but hard to get these. Having Tor and Werredan both at +10% makes this spell actually not that Werredan-centric at all. -- WinterRose 03:36, 7 June 2013 (EDT)

It's possible that there is an upper limit for this bonus of 20%, if so, Tor could have a stronger bonus... but that's just speculation. --Shadowtop 09:41, 25 August 2013 (EDT)

i am of the opinion that the worship tables do something along these lines: Wer 14% Tor 10% Kra 8% Bhy 6% Qxl 5% Ath 0% Dur Rxa Grn -3% Tul Shz and the inherent racial mod gets added to this. - Qemoi